Skip to Content

Update on public and private capital raise for Tech cies

Duration: 26:30


PART 1 — Analytical Summary 🚀

Context 💼

This session at the Odoo Experience features two senior investment bankers from J.P. Morgan: Tongi Pere (Global Chair, Investment Banking) and Rob (London-based equity raiser for high-growth startups). They outline the current state of public and private capital markets and what it means for tech founders. The talk is grounded in recent, real activity—including Odoo’s 2023 secondary raise at a roughly €7B valuation, led by global investors such as Sequoia and CapitalG, with J.P. Morgan advising. The goal: help founders understand when and how to raise capital, what structures to accept, and how public-market dynamics shape private rounds.

Core ideas & innovations 🧠

The speakers anchor everything to a single premise: private fundraising is inseparable from public-market context. Investors—LPs, ICs, and partners—benchmark private deals against how public comps trade and how exits will ultimately occur. Right now, public indices are near all-time highs and volatility is low, so risk appetite is up. Inflation is easing and rates are trending down, which supports equities and opens the IPO window—especially in the US, where filing activity is at the highest level since 2021. That window won’t stay open forever; timing matters.

Sectorally, money is flowing to tech/software/AI, whereas biotech/healthcare remains challenged given recent losses for many VCs. Investors are re-weighting from pure growth to a blend of growth and profitability. The Rule of 40 (growth rate + margin) is again a decisive screen; companies above 40—sometimes 60—command premium valuations. A critical mindset shift: investors ask first about their exit. J.P. Morgan even drafts an “exit memo” alongside the “entry memo,” forcing clarity on whether value realization will come via IPO, M&A, or further private rounds—and on what timeline.

In private markets, dry powder is abundant, but attention is scarce. As public markets heat up, investors face a flood of inbound pitches; their bar for engagement rises, and they look for fast reasons to say “no.” The result is a pronounced dispersion: top-quartile companies attract outsized demand and pricing (an 8x gap at late stage, per the talk), while lower quartile stories struggle or go flat. Valuations are broadly recovering versus 2022, yet investor-friendly terms persist. Liquidation preferences >1x and hybrid/structured instruments are still used to bridge valuation gaps between founder expectations and investor underwriting. Founders must know the cost of capital spectrum: from common equity (most founder-friendly, highest risk for investors) to debt-like instruments that de-risk the investor but can constrain the company.

Executionally, the speakers emphasize “always-on” investor relations. Odoo is held up as a playbook case: keep dozens of relevant investors warm long before you need capital, then press “go” when market and company timing align. Raise when you can—not when you must. That proactive stance reduces process time, improves pricing, and gives optionality on structures. Finally, secondary sales at later stages are a healthy sign: early investors gain liquidity and recycle into earlier-stage startups, which supports the broader ecosystem.

Impact & takeaways 💬

The near-term market is supportive: investors are making money, the IPO window is open in the US, rates are easing, and tech remains an overweight sector. But it’s a selective market—winners get premium terms; the rest face tougher structures or slower processes. Founders should lean into data-driven storytelling: demonstrate your “right to win,” show a credible path to profitability, and move decisively into the Rule of 40+. Build and maintain a live investor pipeline even when you don’t need capital. Be literate in term sheets, liquidation preferences, and structured alternatives; choose instruments that balance valuation with long-term flexibility. And always frame the exit upfront—IPO, M&A, or sustained private capital—so investors can underwrite the journey, not just the next round. ⚙️

PART 2 — Viewpoint: Odoo Perspective

Disclaimer: AI-generated creative perspective inspired by Odoo’s vision.

Capital is a tool, not a goal. Our focus at Odoo has always been to build an integrated, simple product that customers love—and to keep shipping. When markets open, we use the moment to strengthen the company and our community. Staying in dialogue with investors year-round helps us move fast when the timing is right, without compromising on our long-term vision.

The lesson for European builders is clear: think globally, keep your unit economics healthy, and show your right to win. The more we remove complexity for customers, the more resilient we become across cycles. Liquidity comes and goes; product and community endure.

PART 3 — Viewpoint: Competitors (SAP / Microsoft / Others)

Disclaimer: AI-generated fictional commentary. Not an official corporate statement.

The appetite for integrated software platforms remains strong, and Odoo benefits from a clear product narrative and a vibrant ecosystem. In an environment prioritizing the Rule of 40 and exit clarity, that coherence is valuable. The resurgence of US public markets and cross-border capital into Europe also creates new optionality for late-stage outcomes, including larger secondaries and selective IPOs.

The challenges are familiar at enterprise scale: compliance depth, global support, security, and industry-specific functionality. As companies prepare for public-market scrutiny, governance, auditability, and data controls become non-negotiable. Differentiation in UX and TCO is compelling, but sustaining it while maturing enterprise features and partner enablement is the real test—especially as structured financing terms can introduce long-term constraints if not managed carefully.

Disclaimer: This article contains AI-generated summaries and fictionalized commentaries for illustrative purposes. Viewpoints labeled as "Odoo Perspective" or "Competitors" are simulated and do not represent any real statements or positions. All product names and trademarks belong to their respective owners.

Share this post
Archive
Sign in to leave a comment
The comprehensive Odoo journey of KPMG: From pioneering real-time accounting to innovating finance